Ford and General Motors have been two of the most powerful forces in the global auto industry for over a century. They shaped how cars are built, marketed, and driven, and their influence defined American automotive culture. Yet when it comes to electric vehicles, these giants are not leading the race. Tesla, Hyundai, Kia, and even newcomers from China are moving faster and winning more sales in the EV space. The question many ask is why Ford and GM, with all their resources, appear to be lagging behind. The answer lies in corporate strategy, legacy costs, and a belief in alternative technologies that may not match the pace of pure EV adoption.
The Weight of Legacy Production
Unlike Tesla or newer startups, Ford and GM carry the burden of massive existing infrastructure built for gasoline vehicles. Their factories, supply chains, and dealer networks are designed around internal combustion, and retooling them for EVs requires enormous investment and time. Every shift toward EV production comes at the expense of profitable truck and SUV lines, which remain the backbone of their business. While Tesla was born electric, Ford and GM must carefully balance old revenue streams with new investments, and that slows their progress.
A Different Pace of Innovation
Tesla and several foreign automakers have built reputations for rapid innovation and aggressive product cycles. Ford and GM, on the other hand, operate at a slower, more cautious pace. Their approach reflects their scale and history. Rolling out a new EV platform across millions of vehicles is far riskier for them than it is for a startup with fewer models. This cautious pace means their EV launches are often delayed or arrive less competitive in range, charging speed, or software compared to rivals.
Betting on Hybrids and Alternative Technologies
Both Ford and GM have signaled that they see the transition to electrification as more complex than simply going all in on battery electric vehicles. Ford continues to invest in hybrids and plug in hybrids, especially in markets where charging infrastructure is weak. GM has explored hydrogen fuel cells for commercial and heavy duty vehicles, betting that this technology could play a role alongside EVs. These diversions of resources reflect a broader strategy of hedging bets, but they also dilute focus. While competitors pour everything into EVs, Ford and GM spread investment across multiple technologies, slowing their momentum in pure electrics.
The Importance of Trucks and Profit Margins
Trucks and large SUVs are the most profitable vehicles for both companies, and that shapes their priorities. Ford’s F-150 Lightning and GM’s Silverado EV are attempts to electrify their core products, but building electric trucks that meet customer expectations is far more challenging than producing small EV sedans or crossovers. Towing, payload, and long range performance push battery technology to its limits, and both companies have faced delays and production bottlenecks. Their determination to electrify trucks shows where their focus lies, but it also explains why their broader EV lineups lag behind more versatile global brands.
Software and Infrastructure Gaps
Modern EVs are as much about software as hardware, and here Ford and GM have struggled. Tesla’s over the air updates, seamless charging experience, and advanced driver assistance systems remain benchmarks that American legacy automakers have not matched. GM’s Ultium platform and Ford’s BlueCruise system show promise, but the rollout has been slow and uneven. Charging infrastructure is another weak point. While Ford and GM have announced partnerships with charging networks, they are still catching up to Tesla’s Supercharger system, which offers EV owners unmatched convenience.
Do They Truly Believe in the EV Future?
Both Ford and GM have publicly committed to electrification, with ambitious targets for the 2030s and beyond. Yet their actions reveal a cautious optimism rather than full conviction. Ford often emphasizes hybrids as part of its future mix, while GM has invested heavily in fuel cell research for commercial applications. These strategies suggest that while they see EVs as important, they do not view battery electrics as the only solution. Their hesitation may reflect a belief that the market will evolve in multiple directions, with hybrids, EVs, and possibly hydrogen coexisting. This belief, however, risks leaving them behind as consumer interest increasingly shifts toward full electric adoption.
The Road Ahead
Ford and GM are not out of the EV game by any means. Both companies have the scale, engineering talent, and financial power to catch up if they execute well. The Ford Mustang Mach-E, F-150 Lightning, Cadillac Lyriq, and Chevrolet Blazer EV show that they can produce attractive electrics when they commit. But catching up to Tesla, Hyundai, and other leaders will require faster innovation, more aggressive production, and a willingness to let go of legacy thinking. If they continue to hedge their bets on multiple technologies while rivals push hard into electrics, they risk being seen not as leaders of the EV revolution but as reluctant followers.
25 Facts About Car Loans That Most Drivers Don’t Realize
Car loans are one of the most common ways people fund car purchases. Like any other kind of loan, car loans can have certain features that can be regarded as an advantage or a disadvantage to the borrower. Understanding all essential facts about car loans and how they work to ensure that you get the best deal for your financial situation is essential. Here are 25 shocking facts about car loans that most drivers don’t realize:
25 Facts About Car Loans That Most Drivers Don’t Realize
