When it comes to passing Canada’s rigorous safety inspections, especially during resale or registration renewals, not all vehicles are created equal. Harsh winters, rough roads, and tight provincial standards reveal mechanical flaws that many cars can’t hide. Some vehicles are notorious for falling short, from brake line corrosion and rusted frames to failing emissions and suspension issues. If your ride’s on this list, you might face costly repairs or a failed inspection at the worst possible time. Here are 21 vehicles that fail the most Canadian safety inspections:
Dodge Grand Caravan
A staple of Canadian families, the Dodge Grand Caravan often struggles under the weight of long winters and heavy use. Many fail inspections due to rusted brake lines, worn-out struts, and power steering issues. Its 283-hp 3.6L V6 is dependable, but the underbody often shows wear early, especially in salt-heavy provinces. The interior is functional and roomy, but owners frequently face multi-point failures that lead to steep repair bills when inspections roll around.
Chevrolet Impala (2006–2013)
The older Impala may have a comfortable cabin and a V6 pushing 211 to 303 hp, depending on the model year, but it’s infamous among inspectors for corroded frames and worn control arms. Electrical problems also plague this sedan, often triggering dashboard lights that can result in immediate inspection failures. Though roomy and smooth-riding, mechanics routinely flag these models for soft brakes, undercarriage rust, and steering rack wear. Even if it drives well, an Impala from this era might need hundreds or thousands in repairs to pass a provincial inspection.
Ford Escape (2008–2012)
Despite its popularity, earlier models of Ford Escapes were known as inspection flunkers. Common culprits include subframe corrosion, brake line deterioration, and rear shock tower rust, especially in Ontario and Quebec. Performance isn’t the issue; powered by engines ranging from a 171-hp I4 to a 240-hp V6. Instead, it’s longevity. Interiors are basic but functional, yet cabin leaks and worn bushings often lead to failed safety components. If you own or are eyeing an older Escape, check the underside first, as it could save you a failed inspection and a hefty repair bill later.
Hyundai Accent (2010–2015)
Affordable and fuel-efficient with a 138-hp 1.6L engine, the Hyundai Accent seems like a solid budget choice until it’s up for a safety inspection. Mechanics frequently flag issues like exhaust leaks, corroded brake lines, and worn suspension bushings. The compact design doesn’t protect against road salt, and rust in wheel wells and strut mounts is a recurring problem. Interiors are basic but hold up fine, while the structural and mechanical elements get expensive fast from repairs. Many Accents fail on the first pass, particularly in snowbelt provinces where corrosion eats away at critical components.
Nissan Versa (2007–2012)
The early-generation Nissan Versa is a subcompact that was once beloved for its low price but hasn’t aged well under Canadian conditions. With a 1.8L engine pushing a modest 122 hp, the real problems come from rusted brake lines, failing CV joints, and undercarriage wear. Its cabin is simple but susceptible to water intrusion, which only worsens rusting beneath. Mechanics often find cracked bushings and uneven brake wear common fail points. This car is cheap to buy but potentially pricey to pass inspection, especially in regions with icy roads and aggressive salting.
Chevrolet Cobalt (2005–2010)
The Chevy Cobalt might’ve been an affordable compact option in its time, but now it’s one of Canada’s most commonly failed cars during safety inspections. Known for rusted rocker panels, faulty ignition switches, and degraded suspension mounts, this 148-hp compact doesn’t hold up. While fuel-efficient and straightforward inside, the Cobalt’s aging components, especially in the undercarriage, frequently don’t meet provincial safety standards. Frame corrosion and worn brake systems can quickly turn a cheap buy into a costly mistake.
Mazda 3 (2004–2009)
Despite its sporty handling and 148–156 hp engines, early Mazda 3 models are rust magnets, especially in Canadian winters. Mechanics commonly flag rusted rear fenders, brake line corrosion, and worn control arms as inspection fail points. Though the interiors wear reasonably well, it’s what’s underneath that’s a problem. Salt exposure accelerates structural degradation, making even well-maintained units susceptible to frame or suspension issues. Some mechanics won’t certify a Mazda 3 of this era in Quebec and Ontario without extensive underbody repair.
Jeep Liberty (2002–2012)
The Jeep Liberty, equipped with a 3.7L V6 pushing 210 hp, was designed for rugged use, but its reliability record and aging frame tell another story. Safety inspectors often cite excessive frame rust, failing ball joints, and weak steering racks as grounds for failure. While the boxy interior is durable, and its 4WD capability remains appealing, road salt has not been kind to its underside. Suspension components and brake systems degrade quickly in Canadian climates, making it a common inspection failure.
Kia Rio (2006–2012)
The Kia Rio was built for affordability, not longevity. Though its 110–138 hp engine is efficient and the cabin layout is straightforward, corrosion issues plague the chassis. Rusted brake lines, worn-out struts, and disintegrating exhaust systems are common fail points on safety inspections. Interior materials also don’t stand up well to years of Canadian freeze-thaw cycles. Owners often discover they need multiple repairs just to get certified. For a car marketed as budget-friendly, the costs to meet modern safety standards can quickly eclipse its remaining value.
Pontiac G6 (2005–2010)
Pontiac may be gone, but the G6 remains on Canadian roads and inspection bays, where it often fails. Powered by 169 to 252 hp engines, depending on the trim, it offers decent punch, but aging suspension parts, rusted control arms, and persistent electrical problems doom it during safety checks. Its interiors are dated and often riddled with warning lights that raise red flags for inspectors. From ABS failures to corrosion along the underbody, the G6 hasn’t aged gracefully. Many mechanics advise against investing in repairs unless the car is in exceptional condition.
Chrysler Sebring (2001–2010)
With a design that aged fast and a build quality that aged even worse, the Chrysler Sebring is frequently flagged in Canadian inspection bays. The base 2.4L engine makes a modest 173 hp, but that’s hardly the issue, as rusted strut towers, failing tie rods, and undercarriage corrosion often get this sedan red-tagged. Interiors suffer from cracking plastics and faulty electronics that trigger airbag or brake system warnings. In provinces with aggressive salting, the Sebring is known to have structural rust that’s difficult to repair.
Ford Focus (2008–2011)
While the Ford Focus offered budget-friendly mobility and a 140-hp 2.0L engine, it hasn’t aged well under Canadian conditions. Mechanics often fail these vehicles for excessive suspension wear, rusted rocker panels, and faulty steering components. Interior build quality is subpar, with rattles and water leaks leading to mold, another inspection fail point. Brake and control arm issues are prevalent in colder provinces where harsh terrain and salted roads expose the vehicle’s weaknesses.
Toyota Yaris (2007–2012)
Surprising to some, the Toyota Yaris, known for reliability, has inspection issues in Canada due to body rust, exhaust corrosion, and rear axle wear. Its 106-hp engine is efficient and long-lasting, but the underbody doesn’t handle road salt well, especially in older models. The interiors are durable, but inspectors cite brake line deterioration and rusted subframes as fail points. While the car may still run well, passing safety often requires hundreds in undercarriage repairs.
Nissan Altima (2007–2012)
The Nissan Altima was once a solid mid-size option, powered by a capable 2.5L I4 or a punchy 3.5L V6. But older models now struggle to pass safety inspections due to worn suspension mounts, rust-prone undercarriages, and aging catalytic converters. Dashboard warning lights often lead to instant failures, especially those related to the ABS and traction control systems. The interior remains relatively comfortable, but the costs stack up when major components start giving out. Many mechanics now advise caution on used Altimas of this era because it’s a gamble between repair costs and roadworthiness.
Suzuki SX4 (2007–2013)
The Suzuki SX4, a quirky compact with optional AWD and a 143-hp engine, didn’t survive the Canadian market, but many are still on the road, and plenty are failing inspections. Rust-prone wheel wells, deteriorating brake lines, and outdated emissions systems are frequent deal-breakers. Interiors are basic, but don’t hide that finding parts has been increasingly complex since Suzuki exited North America. Mechanics often flag these for multiple issues, making repairs time-consuming and expensive. Despite its good fuel economy and winter performance, the SX4 quickly becomes a safety liability.
Dodge Caliber (2007–2012)
The Dodge Caliber might’ve been marketed as a sporty hatchback, but it’s now infamous for failing Canadian safety inspections. With engines ranging from 148 to 172 hp, the real problem isn’t power. It’s reliability. Suspension bushings, tie rods, and subframe rust are frequent inspection killers. Mechanics also note steering issues and exhaust corrosion, especially in colder regions. The interior, known for cheap plastics and premature wear, does little to redeem it. Many owners discover that the cost of making the Caliber roadworthy far exceeds its actual value.
Dodge Journey
The Dodge Journey has struggled with reliability issues that often lead to failed safety inspections in Canada. Its 2.4L four-cylinder engine produces a modest 173 horsepower but is often overshadowed by electrical glitches affecting critical safety features like airbags and ABS brakes. The acceleration is underwhelming, with 0–100 km/h times around 9 seconds, but the real concern is the frequent brake and suspension problems. Interiors are basic, lacking advanced safety tech found in competitors. Given its history, the Journey is often flagged during inspections.
Saturn Ion (2003–2007)
The Saturn Ion was designed to be innovative but turned out to be anything but enduring. The Ion is a familiar fail-in inspection bay, offering 140 hp and plastic body panels that resisted dings but not deterioration. Most issues stem from severe rust under the frame and ignition switch defects, leading to recalls and degraded steering racks. Interiors are spartan and often plagued by electrical failures and warning light issues. In Ontario and Quebec, mechanics frequently warn owners that these cars may not justify the repairs needed to bring them to a safety standard.
Ford Windstar (1999–2003)
The Ford Windstar is a chronic safety failure in Canada. With a 200-hp 3.8L V6 and plenty of interior space, it was once a family staple, but rear axle fractures, brake line corrosion, and rusted-out subframes tarnish its legacy. These issues are costly to repair and often deemed unsafe to continue driving. Even if the interior remains relatively intact, inspectors regularly red-flag these vans for structural instability. Several recalls were issued over the years, but many Windstars still slip through the cracks until inspection.
Jeep Patriot
The Jeep Patriot’s rugged styling doesn’t always match up to its safety record. Its 2.0L or 2.4L engines deliver 158 to 172 horsepower, but inconsistent build quality has led to frequent mechanical issues like faulty brake systems and electrical problems. Acceleration is slow, with a 0–100 km/h time exceeding 10 seconds, which may not inspire confidence in emergency maneuvers. Its interior safety features are basic, lacking many modern driver assists. These flaws contribute to high failure rates on Canadian safety inspections, raising red flags for potential buyers looking for dependable, safe SUVs.
Subaru Legacy (2005–2009)
The Subaru Legacy has AWD credibility and a 175–243 hp engine, depending on trim, but that doesn’t save it from inspection trouble. Rusted subframes, oil leaks, and failed head gaskets are common issues flagged by Canadian mechanics. While it performs well in snow, years of salt exposure affect brake lines and suspension mounts. The cabin is generally well-built, but aging electronic systems, particularly airbag sensors, often trigger dashboard warning lights that lead to failed inspections.
22 Times Canadian Ingenuity Left the U.S. in the Dust
When people think of innovation, they often picture Silicon Valley. However, Canada has a history of innovation, too. Whether it’s redefining sports, revolutionizing medicine, or just showing America up at its own game, Canadian inventors, thinkers, and dreamers have had their fair share of mic-drop moments. Here are 22 times Canadian ingenuity left the U.S. in the dust.
22 Times Canadian Ingenuity Left the U.S. in the Dust
